Home/Guides/Getting your concert photos published
Getting your concert photos published
To get concert photos published, pitch within 24 hours while the show is still news, to a named editor rather than a general inbox, with a tight edit and one line on why this show matters. Late and large is the usual reason a pitch goes unanswered.
Being able to answer “who are you shooting for?” with one word changes which shows you can get into. That is the main reason to bother getting published, and it is more achievable than it looks.
Publication is not the point of concert photography, and it pays badly or not at all. It is worth pursuing anyway, for one practical reason: a named outlet answers the question that closes the door on large shows.
Why an outlet unlocks access
At club level, a credible body of work and a clear offer is usually enough. At larger rooms and on label-run tours, the list is frequently built from publications — the publicist is allocating a fixed number of pit slots and is asked to justify each one. "Independent" is a harder sentence for them to defend than a masthead.
That is the whole mechanism. You are not chasing prestige; you are chasing an answer to one question. This is one of the four refusals covered in what to do when you do not get the photo pass.
Pitch before the show, not after
The single most common mistake is shooting a show and then offering the photos. By then the news value is gone and the publication has already covered it or decided not to.
The workable sequence is the reverse:
- A tour or a Paris date is announced.
- You pitch coverage of that specific date to a publication, four to six weeks out.
- They say yes, and they request the accreditation — publications usually have a working relationship with the publicist that you do not.
- You shoot it and deliver on their deadline.
Step three is the part people miss. Once an outlet has commissioned you, the accreditation request stops being yours.
Who to write to
For small and mid-size publications, the music editor is the right contact — usually the same person who arranges access for a reviewer. Larger outlets may have a separate photo editor. A general contact address is a last resort and gets the slowest answer.
Be realistic about scale. A national magazine has a photographer already. A local music site, a genre blog, a student radio station's web arm, or a scene newsletter are all real publications with real accreditation weight and a permanent shortage of people willing to work.
What to send
Short, specific, and about them:
- The show and the date, named, with the reason it is worth covering.
- One line on who you are and a link to a tight portfolio — twenty strong frames, not two hundred. Building a concert photography portfolio covers the edit.
- Work that resembles their coverage. Sending metal photographs to an electronic music site reads as a mass mailing, because it is.
- What they get and when. "Edited set within 24 hours of the show" is the sentence that makes you easy to say yes to.
Do not attach files to a first email. A link that opens in one tap is what gets looked at on a phone.
Settle the terms before you shoot
Ask, in writing and before the show: what is the fee if any, what usage are they buying, how long does it last, and does it include their social accounts. "Exposure" is not a usage term and the ambiguity always resolves in their favour later.
Most small-publication work is unpaid or close to it. That can be a reasonable trade for access early on — but it should be a decision you made, not one you discovered. What to agree before a paid concert shoot and who owns your concert photos in France cover the terms.
Or publish yourself
A consistent, genuinely maintained site of Paris show coverage is a publication. It is slower and it earns nothing directly, but it is entirely under your control, and it makes the accreditation email considerably easier to write. The failure mode is obvious: a site with three posts from last year is worse than saying you are independent.
Deliver like a professional and it repeats
Hit the deadline, send the agreed number of files at the agreed size, caption them correctly with the artist and venue, and be reachable the next morning. Editors reassign to people who did not create work for them. That is the entire mechanism of a second commission.
Common questions
- Do I need to be published to get a photo pass?
- Not at club level, where a credible portfolio and a clear offer is usually enough. It matters much more for large rooms and label-run tours.
- Should I pitch before or after the show?
- Before. Once a publication commissions you, they request the accreditation, and they have a working relationship with the publicist that you do not.
- Who do I contact at a publication?
- The music editor at small and mid-size outlets — often the same person who arranges access for reviewers. Larger publications may have a separate photo editor.
- Does publication pay?
- Usually little or nothing at small outlets. Treat it as an access trade you chose deliberately, and settle the usage terms in writing before you shoot.
- Is starting my own site worth it?
- It can be, if you maintain it. A consistently updated site of Paris coverage carries real weight; an abandoned one is worse than being independent.
Liaison lists upcoming Paris shows with their venues and promoters, so you can pitch a specific date while it is still worth covering.
See tonight's Paris shows